Before you begin to read this article, ask yourself a question. Are you familiar with how disinformation campaigns work? Are you familiar with the following ¬†expressions? INTEL, CIA, NSA, ( CO) ¬†Covert Operations, troll, shill, informant, deception, counter intelligence, and of course, disinformation?
If you are familiar, then I would like to point out the obvious in this article, that being Chemtrail activists were deceived by paid individuals who were hired to strategically place ¬†disinformation right in the heart of activist camps.
Unfortunately, most of you are eating up the lie, that being ¬†the propaganda that is being ¬†spread about the science and technology of ¬†Geoengineering ¬†being referred to as ¬†Chemtrails when it is NOT ! It is important to know that it is NOT one in the same, and ¬†it’s time you did a little homework.
It is frustrating ¬†that ¬†so many people are ¬†still referring ¬†to ¬†chemtrails as ¬†”geoengineering”. ¬†This is disinformation at it’s best. ¬†It is an outrageous lie at the very least.
Why is it so important to KNOW the difference between CHEMTRAILS and GEOENGINEERING?
Why the distinction?
Keep in mind why we are using the distinction between the two terms: (an example for those of you who repeatedly ask our team )
The distinction should be made when we are exposing the truths about ¬†chemtrails, especially if we are attempting to stay on a solid ¬†proving ground. Think about an activist who is trying to fight fluoride in the water. If you were having a discussion about fluoride levels in our ¬†drinking water supplies, would you use the word the ¬†” arsenic ” instead ¬†and consider ¬†both toxic chemicals to be ¬†one in the same? Just because both of these chemicals are poisonous doesn’t mean you will even begin to win the argument.
Arsenic is notoriously poisonous to multicellular life, although¬†a few species of bacteria¬†are able to use arsenic compounds as respiratory metabolites.¬†Arsenic contamination of groundwater¬†is a problem that affects millions of people across the world. However , Fluoride is¬†the¬†anion¬†of¬†fluorine. Fluoride, like other¬†halides, is a monovalent¬†ion¬†(‚ąí1 charge). Structurally, and to some extent chemically, the fluoride¬†ion¬†resembles the¬†hydroxide¬†ion. In water solutions, fluoride ion is a weak base. Fluoride ion occurs on earth in several minerals, particularly¬†fluorite, but is only present in very trace quantities in water. Flouride has been proven to be toxic and should not be in our water supplies.
The evidence thus ¬†far indicates that chemtrails ¬†are ¬†far from being a well intentioned program to protect the planet from radiation. During what most of us refer to as ‘ heavy spray days’, the public has ¬†reported a variety of ¬†health problems. They ¬†also reported that severe weather phenomena generally occurred ¬†following heavy chemtrails spraying. More video evidence supports that the ¬†temperature of ¬†jet- trails¬† measures ¬†higher than that of a clear sky, which is ¬†proof that SRM (SolarRadiation Management) ¬†which is supposed to shield us from the sun is doing no such thing.
In order to get the public’s ¬†support, geoengineers ¬†have been ¬†working quickly to ¬†improve the image of the trails via social engineering and propaganda (i.e. programs such as SRM , the supposed solution to global warming, which is yet another questionable theory. ¬†This is only serving to confuse the public , especially because the public has become more aware of chemtrails in the global skies.
The excuse currently being used by the public at large as to why they prefer to use the term ¬†”geoengineering ” as opposed to “chemtrails” , ¬†is because they claim ¬†the use of the word ¬†chemtrail¬†is often associated with a lunatic conspiracy theory. This is utterly ridiculous!
1. The general public has begin to accept that ¬†Geoengineering programs are¬†(like SRM Solar Radiation Management) necessary to protect us from radiation and continued heating of the planet.(Remember NAZI Germany?)
2. How do you intend to explain that chemtrails are ¬†poisons being sprayed into the atmosphere if you continue to ¬†call them geoengineering? You must begin to use ¬†a more specific language in order to convey the true agenda behind chemtrail programs (SAG).
SAG is NOT SRM. PERIOD!
3 . By becoming anti- geoengineering, we confront the people who want to use the term ¬†geoengineering to fight back the effect of chemtrails. Chemtrails cause droughts and flooding. As long as chemtrails are dominating our atmosphere, people will try to reduce the effect of chemtrails by doing something about ¬†it, some of ¬†these ¬†efforts just ¬†happen to be named geoengineering. I have seen people condemned country who try to combat chemtrails by doing geoengineering. They are chasing the wrong target. Their effort would not help reduce chemtrails. Their effort make bad impression of chemtrails operation. They should help people surviving chemtrails, but what they did is reducing the chance to survive the threat created by chemtrails. Cloud seeding may be not to effective against chemtrails, but they use it to save live. And cloud seeding really do save live. Although chemtrails will usually make cloud seeding ineffective. Sadly not many know the difference between clouds seeding and chemtrails.
5. Geoengineering can be an effort to deal with the effect of chemtrails. It is really wrong to call chemtrails as geoengineering. Because we will never see a third country performing chemtrails spraying to combat the effect of chemtrails, they will perform geoengineering (ie. cloud seeding) instead.
6. If you stop geoengineering operation in your local area, are you sure will see no chemtrails? I highly doubt that because in my local area even if there is no schedule for cloud seeding or other geoengineering operations, yet chemtrails are still visible and sometimes extremely intense. We have all experienced this.
7.To attempt the prohibition of geoengineering ¬†programs does not stop the use of chemtrails. But I am sure that stopping chemtrails will stop geoengineering because people would have no reason to do geoengineering.This is a scam and a game!
8. How do you expect scientists to respond to you when you ask them about ¬†geoengineering, I can tell you that ¬†they ¬†think you ask about cloud seeding and weather modification programs which are NOT to be confused with chemtrails.. Chemrails ¬†are sprayed by unmarked jets (we think military) and a scientific geoengineer employee has no idea what you are asking about within the context of your question. What would ¬†scientist say if you asked them about giant vapor clouds being sprayed by unmarked military jets?
The word CHEMTRAIL
If you want to call chemtrails alternative words or references, then ¬†there are ¬†more suitable words than geoengineering. Wiki provides us with ¬†a general idea of what the media wants people to think. Here is an excerpt:
“The chemtrail conspiracy theory posits that some trails left by aircraft are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in clandestine programs directed by various government officials. This theory is not accepted by the scientific community, which states that they are just normal contrails, as there is no scientific evidence supporting the chemtrail theory.”
“Geoengineering is the deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth‚Äôs climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming. The discipline divides broadly into two categories- carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management. Carbon dioxide removal addresses a cause of climate change by removing one of the greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Solar radiation management attempts to offset effects of greenhouse gases by causing the Earth to absorb less solar radiation. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded in 2007 that geoengineering options remained largely unproven. Geoengineering has been proposed as a potential third option for tackling global warming, alongside mitigation and adaptation.“
From ¬†the wiki definition, it’s s clear that there is absolutely no relationship between chemtrails and geoengineering. Chemtrails is an experiment, secretive, with no time frame, and ¬†no public data! It’s TOP SECRET clearance only, what does that say to you?
On the other hand ,geoengineering is being touted, reported and ¬†programs like SRM are wide open to the public , regardless of there motive ¬†that is supposedly to mitigate ” global warming”. It is mentioned in climate change documets, and on June 25th, 2013, Obama even brought the issue up again to the public
The CHEMTRAIL Agenda and it’s associated programs are ¬†DENIED! They are called a conspiracy : similar to the absolute DENIAL of ¬†UFO’s , ET’s, JFK assassination, 911 the inside job, nuclear missiles, bomb blasting of our oceans, and just recently, spying! (Thank God ¬†for ¬†whistle blowers ¬†who are risking there lives to tell us ¬†us the truth!)
Geoengineering ¬†technologies are traceable, they are ¬†public, and their programs are not being denied whatsoever in the global media.
“Weather modification is the act of intentionally manipulating or altering the weather. The most common form of weather modification is cloud seeding to increase rain or snow, usually for the purpose of increasing the local water supply. Weather modification can also have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hail or hurricanes, from occurring; or of provoking damaging weather against an enemy or rival, as a tactic of military or economic warfare. Weather modification in warfare has been banned by the United Nations.”
“Genocide is “the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group”, though what constitutes enough of a “part” to qualify as genocide has been subject to much debate by legal scholars.“
“Mass murder (in military contexts, sometimes interchangeable with “mass destruction”) is the act of murdering a large number of people, typically at the same time or over a relatively short period of time.“
With so many choices in our vocabulary, it is becoming an absolute phenomenon as to why ¬†most activists insist on using ¬†a ¬†mismatched word. Geoengineering is perhaps concocted ¬†not only decieve, but ¬†convince the public that “everything is okay, we’ve got this,we ¬†are simply trying to heal the planet”.Wrong! ¬†Wake up because this is a distraction to thousands of ¬†activists. ¬†Chemtrails is exactly what it sounds like “Chemical Trails”. ¬† But now there is an attempt to replace the word chemtrails with word that have positive meaning and credibility, such as geoengineering. What used to be seen as something dreadfull, now has ¬†been propagandized ¬†and ¬†manipulated to be spoken of and observed as a blessing. This is worse than wrong, it is called ¬†public consent, and believe me , you have no idea of what you just approved because the big boys, the corps and the global government is good at conning the public.And thats is what this wordsmith game is all about.
If you believe that chemtrails are the same as geoengineering programs, then I hate to say it, but you have now just become part of the problem. Not your fault though, the government is good at what they do, and they have been propagandizing the public for a century, nothing new here.
Prove me wrong!
The Truth Denied
Staff writer 6-26-13