An educational children’s book entitled Funny Clouds: A Chemtrail Tale written by environmental activists and mom Raphaelle O’Neil was released on March 3, 2016 and was immediately debunked in the Amazon book review comment section. This is no surprise, as the book exposes environmental toxicities that are being emitted from airplanes in our global skies. ‘Funny Clouds’ and its illustrations by Sean Gautreaux portray an accurate depiction of an ongoing geoengineering program that has evolved since the 1990’s. In general, even though geoengineers such as David Keith have publicly admitted the existence and deployment of the weather modification programs, one being SRM (Solar Radiation Management), the clandestine projects are still not recognized by government officials and major news outlets. If the chemtrails are discussed on mainstream news, it is not to educate the viewers, and only serves to debunk the programs.
As a result, within hours of books debut on Amazon, the public ‘reviews’ launched an attack against the book in what appeared to be an outraged public. They were attempting to immediately debunk the book as well as the author, in some cases referring to the book as “child abuse”, “moronic”, a “hoax”, and “conspiradrivel”.
The March release of children’s book “Funny Clouds: A Chemtrail Tale” has the ability to change the perspective for both children and parents when it comes to the alleged Chemtrail Conspiracy. If you were born earlier than the 1960’s, then keep in mind that you are witnesses to the fact that clouds appeared differently and that there were no white plumes or mile wide white X’s in our skies; and certainly enormous white grids were a thing of the future, not the past.
“What we are looking at in our skies are not real clouds, they are manufactured by use of chemicals such as Barium, Strontium, & Aluminum in Nano sized particulates which are injected into the atmosphere on a daily basis globally. Big difference!” Roxy Lopez
Chemtrails in Arizona December 2016
“Solar geoengineering looks likely to overshadow nuclear energy and shale gas as the most controversial issue in climate politics” – Climate Scientist and Geoengineer David Keith @2015
(ABOVE ^^^) The Supreme Court found that U.S. patent #645,576 “System of Transmission of Electrical Energy” proves he invented radio; not Marconi. He pioneered radar. He invented wireless signal and power transmission. Yes, power can be transmitted wirelessly; we’ll have more about that later. ” Author Peter Kirby states that ” Weather Modification is the most prooveable part of the NEW MANHATTAN PROJECT.”
As O’Neil cleverly points out, artificial clouds don’t even appear to be real, which is where Raphaelle came up with the name of the book “Funny Clouds”. After reading several comments on Amazon, it should be called “Chemtrails for Dummies”. It went right over there heads, which by the way is where chemtrails reside, above our heads. Chemtrails have been known to block the suns rays via SRM programs, shielding earth from dangerous radiation. Geoengineering fallout of the aluminum particulates have also been proven to make forest fires more prevalent as well as harder to extinguish because the fires burn hotter, according to fire fighters.
So why is the book getting debunked by harsh comments on Amazon? Here are some of the comments, and we ask the public to please post to Amazon in order to prove that those who are posting to the comment section of the book are not the ordinary person.
The debunking that is occurring in connection with O’Neils book could not be further from the truth, and this should be a sign to the public that a nerve has hit and obviously, ‘Funny Clouds: A Chemtrail Tale’ is a threat in the sense that it is and will continue to be an effective tool for teaching our youth how to protect themselves in the future against harmful aerial environmental toxicities. Geoengineering is not a hoax. Keep in mind, wireless phones and their emissions were debunked when they were associated with cancer; cell phone towers and smart meters were debunked until the public began reporting heart attacks. Drilling and fracking for oil was debunked until thousands of citizens began filing medical lawsuits for ‘loss of life’ because of the toxicity in the drinking water caused by heavy metal toxins used in fracking such as Barium and Strontium, which are known to be cancer causing agents. Yet hours after the book launch, the attack was obvious. Vaccines have been a controversial matter for 20 plus years, but due to public advocacy the movement has finally achieved public recognition and concerns related to vaccines and their lethal side effects in children and the elderly. BIG PHARMA is a trillion dollar Industry. They have the money to place worldwide ads in favor of their products, and bury any negative news.
Again, who and why are they debunking the book? For one, that is me on the 5 STAR on top. The rest of these comments? We looked into it and in the last 8 hours, the account names keep changing. What does that say?
On March 3, 2016 a ‘reviewers’ named G. Hinsonon on Amazon stated “I feel sorry for the children of any adult that would buy such a book.”
Other comments ensued within hours, exemplifying similar emotional aggression about a children’s book that they most likely had not even ordered, read or received yet. The book was just released, the same day the comments showed up. How can anyone even begin pass judgement on a book they haven’t read? Are these comments really coming from the avid readers in the GENERAL PUBLIC? If not, then who are these people?
- Another comment from McKon (interesting name) commented ““Teaching children to be afraid of what they don’t understand is truly moronic. The silly hoax known as “chemtrails” is only believable to dumbest members of society. Pick up an actual science book, instead of this waste of ink and paper.”
Another commenter really sounded like what is known in the commercial industry as a ‘shill’.
- “Spreading idiocy and paranoia to children for profit should be a criminal act!”
So if you don’t understand that Geoengineering truly exists, does that mean it doesn’t?
Check out a 2007 TedTalks lecture entitled “A Critical look at Geoengineering against Climate Change”. The lecturer was given by Environmental Scientist, David Keith. From the interactive transcript notes, anyone can easily assume that synthetic altering of the weather could explain the possibilities of chemtrails and artificial cloud formations.
“Environmental scientist David Keith proposes a cheap, effective, shocking means to address climate change: What if we injected a huge cloud of ash into the atmosphere to deflect sunlight and heat?”
In 2015, Debra K. Weisenstein and David Keith via Harvard University published several papers related to the climate and geoeningineering (aka Chemtrails). The research article is entitled Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere.
The Manuscript opens up by stating:
“Abstract 9 Solid aerosol particles have long been proposed as an alternative to sulfate aerosols for solar 10 geoengineering. Any solid aerosol introduced into the stratosphere would be subject to 11 coagulation with itself, producing fractal aggregates, and with the natural sulfate aerosol, 12 producing liquid-coated solids. Solid aerosols that are coated with sulfate and/or have formed 13 aggregates may have very different scattering properties and chemical behavior than do uncoated 14 non-aggregated monomers. We use a two-dimensional chemistry-transport-aerosol model to 15 capture the dynamics of interacting solid and liquid aerosols in the stratosphere. As an example, 16 we apply the model to the possible use of alumina and diamond particles for solar geoengineering.” Read the manuscript here : http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/15/11799/2015/acp-2015-186-manuscript-version3.pdf
Wait: Isn’t this the point of the book FUNNY CLOUDS”??
“We use a two-dimensional chemistry-transport-aerosol model to 15 capture the dynamics of interacting solid and liquid aerosols in the stratosphere. As an example, 16 we apply the model to the possible use of alumina and diamond particles for solar geoengineering.” -Geoengineering Scientist David Keith from The Risks of Geoengineering
“Solar geoengineering would be extremely cheap, with a projected price tag of a few billion dollars a year “ -David Keith @2015
Show your support on Facebook
Listen, there is more than enough proof to fill up a library that artificial cloud formations caused by Geoengineering programs globally exist . It’s a fact. There is more proof that geoengineering and weather modification programs have been deployed worldwide without any public consent, yet the public is more apt to believe that our government is honest and is constantly looking out for us, or that their money is safe in the hands of Big banks. Whether Geoengineering saves the planet from global warming or not, to deny it’s existence is purely idiotic. We are way past denying it’s existence, and more concerned with it’s effects on the planet.
I challenge you to purchase the book. I challenge the public to make comments associated with the book, regardless your stance on chemtrails and geoengineering programs. I challenge you to do your research, and contact The Truth Denied if you find our research conflicts with yours. Raise the bar in your life. Take a stand and give this author feedback either way.Let’s make an effort to bring our blue skies back. Order you book today!
“Awareness is half the battle; the other half is taking Action. There is nothing more important than creating awareness so that we can make the changes that are abundantly clear to me as an investigator, yet completely invisible to most. ” Author Roxy