THE TRUTH DENIED in Conjunction with CHEMTRAILS KILL
The question is : “What we are looking at in our skies , are they real clouds or are they manufactured by use of chemicals such as Barium, Strontium, & Aluminum in Nano sized particulates which are injected into the atmosphere on a daily basis globally. We have not been able to answer this question. “
“Solar geoengineering looks likely to overshadow nuclear energy and shale gas as the most controversial issue in climate politics” – Climate Scientist and Geoengineer David Keith @2015
(ABOVE ^^^) The Supreme Court found that U.S. patent #645,576 “System of Transmission of Electrical Energy” proves he invented radio; not Marconi. He pioneered radar. He invented wireless signal and power transmission. Yes, power can be transmitted wirelessly; we’ll have more about that later. ” Author Peter Kirby states that ” Weather Modification is the most prooveable part of the NEW MANHATTAN PROJECT.”
Check out a 2007 TedTalks lecture entitled “A Critical look at Geoengineering against Climate Change”. The lecturer was given by Environmental Scientist, David Keith. From the interactive transcript notes, anyone can easily assume that synthetic altering of the weather could explain the possibilities of chemtrails and artificial cloud formations.
“Environmental scientist David Keith proposes a cheap, effective, shocking means to address climate change: What if we injected a huge cloud of ash into the atmosphere to deflect sunlight and heat?”
In 2015, Debra K. Weisenstein and David Keith via Harvard University published several papers related to the climate and geoeningineering (aka Chemtrails). The research article is entitled Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere.
The Manuscript opens up by stating:
“Abstract 9 Solid aerosol particles have long been proposed as an alternative to sulfate aerosols for solar 10 geoengineering. Any solid aerosol introduced into the stratosphere would be subject to 11 coagulation with itself, producing fractal aggregates, and with the natural sulfate aerosol, 12 producing liquid-coated solids. Solid aerosols that are coated with sulfate and/or have formed 13 aggregates may have very different scattering properties and chemical behavior than do uncoated 14 non-aggregated monomers. We use a two-dimensional chemistry-transport-aerosol model to 15 capture the dynamics of interacting solid and liquid aerosols in the stratosphere. As an example, 16 we apply the model to the possible use of alumina and diamond particles for solar geoengineering.” Read the manuscript here : http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/15/11799/2015/acp-2015-186-manuscript-version3.pdf
“We use a two-dimensional chemistry-transport-aerosol model to 15 capture the dynamics of interacting solid and liquid aerosols in the stratosphere. As an example, 16 we apply the model to the possible use of alumina and diamond particles for solar geoengineering.” -Geoengineering Scientist David Keith from The Risks of Geoengineering
“Solar geoengineering would be extremely cheap, with a projected price tag of a few billion dollars a year “ -David Keith @2015
Show your support on Facebook
Listen, there is more than enough proof to fill up a library that artificial cloud formations caused by Geoengineering programs globally exist . It’s a fact. There is more proof that geoengineering and weather modification programs have been deployed worldwide without any public consent, yet the public is more apt to believe that our government is honest and is constantly looking out for us, or that their money is safe in the hands of Big banks. Whether Geoengineering saves the planet from global warming or not, to deny it’s existence is purely idiotic. We are way past denying it’s existence, and more concerned with it’s effects on the planet.
“Awareness is half the battle; the other half is taking Action. There is nothing more important than creating awareness so that we can make the changes that are abundantly clear to me as an investigator, yet completely invisible to most. ” Author Roxy