This page is a running list of topics and links that contributors to The Truth Denied are researching. This information is not in order and will change regularly. As new things come up we will move excess information to the archive. Currently we are anticipating a considerable site update, information shared here will be made searchable. This is one new update amongst a list of other site directive tools we are working on. News Archive -
Aerosol Patent Research -
Headlines ~ Are scientists trying to react with the compression that occurs during a CME event?
"Scientists have long known that the vigorous injection of gas and ash into the stratosphere can cause changes in global weather patterns and climate by reflecting sunlight away from Earth and heating the upper atmosphere." Read More...
Geoengineered solutions to climate change fall into roughly two categories, Keith said.
1.) The first, carbon cycle engineering, includes slower and more expensive solutions that offer long-term fixes by removing carbon from the environment. It includes things like adding iron to the ocean, which would trigger large-scale plankton blooms that remove carbon from the environment, adding alkalinity to land and sea, and locking up carbon in biochar.
2.)The second category, solar radiation management, includes shorter-term fixes that block sunlight from reaching the Earth and then getting trapped by greenhouse gases. These solutions include changing the planet’s reflectivity in one way or another, including the injection of sulfates or engineered particles into the atmosphere. Their advantage, Keith said, is that they’re relatively cheap and easy to do.
These solutions, however, have potential side effects, such as changing rainfall patterns and reducing atmospheric ozone. That’s why, Keith said, research should begin to understand their potential effects — both good and bad — so that wise choices can be made.
“We need to understand how this might not work, as well as how it might work,” Keith said. “We have to bring this out in the open and talk about it.”
STATEMENT BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CLIMATE RESPONSE FUND
March 19, 2010
We, the members of the board, are honored that more than 195 scientific and policy leaders from around the world will join us at the Asilomar Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies, March 22-26, 2010. CRF’s objective for this conference is solely to initiate relevant discussions between scientists, environmentalists and policy makers and to facilitate the development of voluntary guidelines for the field of climate intervention technologies or geoengineering. CRF considers this conference as the beginning of a process.
The mission of the Climate Response Fund:
When the Climate Response Fund was formed we discussed and considered all potential activities related to climate intervention that CRF might fund, including among other activities field experiments in tropospheric aerosols, adding alkalinity to the ocean and ocean fertilization. We soon rejected the notion of funding field experiments as inappropriate for us. Our mission was formulated with this in mind.
Our mission is to:
* Foster safe and responsible research on climate intervention by:
- providing a neutral forum where norms and guidelines for climate intervention research can be discussed and developed
- working with national and international partners to encourage appropriate organizations to incorporate the suggested norms and guidelines into their deliberations on climate intervention research; and to
* Work with national and international partners to communicate information about climate intervention research to interested groups and the general public.
In other words, the Climate Response Fund exists to fund conferences, dialogues and discussions about climate intervention, and to assist in conveying the results of such deliberations to all parties interested in mitigating climate change.
To be absolutely clear, Climate Response Fund will not fund field experiments for any climate intervention technique now or in the future including, but not limited to, ocean fertilization, solar radiation management by stratospheric aerosols, tropospheric aerosols, adding alkalinity to the ocean or any other particular climate mitigation techniques.
Regarding the “Thank You Dinner” on March 26 at Asilomar:
The Climate Response Fund is hosting a private dinner following the Asilomar International Conference for our donors, board and advisors. This is neither a conference dinner, nor an extension of the conference, nor a fundraising event. All invitations sent by CRF indicated that the purpose of the dinner is merely to thank these individuals for their support of the conference and to have Dr. MacCracken brief them on preliminary results of the conference. We have also invited members of the Scientific Organizing Committee to attend, as they might be interested in meeting some of the people whose funding made the conference possible. It is normal for organizations to thank and brief their financial and substantive supporters in this way.
Regarding CRF Fiscal Administration:
The Climate Response Fund has been publicly criticized by certain parties because Mr. William Kohrs, who handled CRF’s fiscal administration on a part-time basis for the conference, is also VP Finance and Administration of Climos, Inc., a private for-profit company that hopes to develop climate mitigation techniques. Mr. Kohrs is not an employee of CRF, but rather a temporary accounting consultant who has only assisted CRF in preparations for the conference. He was not chosen because of his connection to Climos, but rather because he performs similar financial services for small entities. The CRF Board reviewed his appointment at the time and now has reviewed his subsequent service. We determined that there is absolutely no conflict of interest. However, since neither the CRF Board, nor Mr. Kohrs, wish to allow even the perception of a conflict of interest, Mr. Kohrs offered, and the Board accepted, his resignation from his contract, which would otherwise have ended in June 2010.
The Board of CRF takes this opportunity to reaffirm its commitment to the highest standards of transparency and ethics, even beyond technicalities of law. We have responded to all questions raised to us. We believe this is critical to public acceptance of our work, and we call on others in the field of climate mitigation to do likewise.
The Climate Response Fund Board of Directors
Amb. Richard Elliot Benedick, Senior Advisor to the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory-University of Maryland Joint Global Change Research Institute
Kim Cranston, CEO and co-founder, TransparentDemocracy.org
Dr. Margaret Leinen, CEO and founder, Climate Response Fund
Seth Perlman, Senior Partner, Perlman and Perlman, LLP.
Dr. Jerry Schubel, President and CEO, Aquarium of the Pacific
Patent reform inched closer to reality last week when the Senate approved a package of amendments to bipartisan legislation that would overhaul the U.S. patent system for the first time in almost 60 years. The bill would transform how the agency sets and collects fees, spur action on a massive patent application backlog, and potentially overturn the U.S. basis for patent recognition.
Steve Susman for Congress
10243 Torrington Lane
Houston, Texas 77075
To Whom It May Concern,
Among many issues pertinent in my 2010 Congressional Campaign for the 22nd District in Texas, were the problems brought to my attention via Geo-Engineering aka Chemtrails. In the beginning, I believed these to be some sort of “conspiracy theory”. However, upon researching various sources especially after the leaked “Climategate” e-mails, and witnessing the virtual death of a wooded area across the road from my employer have come to the conclusion that they are not. This wooded area behind William Hobby airport in Houston, Texas came under assault on a weekly basis from aircraft small and large. I watched the deterioration of the trees from top down as well as the forest animals that died for no apparent reason over a five year period.
This program instituted by the United Nations, in conjunction with NASA scientists(1), I believe has sickened many citizens, polluted our arable land and water as well as reduced the population of bees and other species essential to food chain production. The dissertation given in the above referenced 144 page document claims that this program is designed to protect us from “Global Warming,” another very questionable subject to say the least. I fail to see where the disbursement of metallic particles such as aluminum, barium, mixed with a cocktail of polymer fibers and mycoplasma have any positive effect on what is troubling the atmosphere. (see http://www.thebestofrawfood.com/what-are-chemtrails.html ).
In my case, where NASA space travel funding is being severely cut in this district, there has been no reduction in the severity and frequency of these dispersal flights. My opposition, incumbent Pete Olson, declines all questioning regarding NASA’s role in the geo-engineering program. Being that Mr. Olson spends quite a large amount of time a Johnson Space Center when he is home from
Washington, DC leads one to some conclusions which may or may not be correct.
What I find more deeply disturbing and too coincidental, is the passage of the Food Safety Bill(S-510) that happened recently. It begs the question; Are the organizations responsible for the aerial spraying of these substances working in the interests of corporations that benefit our elected officials? It seems that Monsanto corporation is and has been developing genetically modified seeds that are resistant to these chemical elements. Could it be that these chemical “death dumps” are in an effort to destroy the soil and water used by small family farms? The evidence is piling up and summarized best in a documentary financed by G. Edward Griffin; “What In The world Are They Spraying?”
For quite some time, our elected officials have demonized those of us who dare to question these phenomena known as Chemtrails. We are labeled as “kooks” and “conspiracy theorists” when it is apparent that this program has been going on for decades. As a Liberty Candidate, I would be derelict in my duty to this country not to ask questions and demand answers. In my limited research, ( I have many issues that the constituents are concerned with) I have learned much through researcher Roxy Lopez and the organization, The Truth Denied. If by some small miracle, I am elected, I intend to bring this issue to the forefront of congressional discussion. I am also very concerned that these operations are unlicensed and unregulated, or worse yet, hidden under the cloak of “cloud seeding” or weather modification. If it were up to me, this program would be ceased, and all planes in evidence of this procedure would be forced down by military or shot down as hostile aircraft. It is imperative that the general public be informed on the actual purpose and intent of these flights and this process. Our government must be held accountable for these actions that only seem to result in respiratory illnesses, pollution of land and water supply. With such a huge concern over “terrorism” it would seem logical that people would voice such a concern.
In evidence also, these aerosol flights are continuing over the Louisiana coastline. Corexit 9500 is being dispersed to supposedly control the damage resulting from the BP oil disaster. This continues
Without pause despite the growing amount of sickness of the residents. Human error may result in one of these dispersal aircraft being deployed over a populated area without proper cleaning. Corexit 9500 mixed with aluminum, barium, and polyfiber could have a catastrophic effect on all forms of life at that point.
I encourage you to contact me regarding any pertinent questions that you may have regarding this matter, and implore you to delve deeply into this subject. The ramifications are astounding.
*Evergreen Aviation Admits to Chemtrail Contracts with USAF
Written by Joan Biakov
Friday, 14 January 2011 12:40
"Evergreen Aviation, one of the worlds largest private aviation companies
admits to weather modification service.
On their own website in the Markets section for their New Super Tanker they
state Weather modification among other interesting service markets.
Content copied directly from Evergreen Aviation website:
The Evergreen Supertanker is not just limited to fighting fire . It will be
a true utilitarian aircraft with the capability to configure to different
applications on short notice. This multimission aircraft can support
sensitive security and environmental missions. The aircraft’s exceptional
drop capabilities, loiter time and size make it an ideal tool to perform
challenging homeland security missions, able to neutralize chemical attacks
on military installments or major population centers, and help control
large, environmentally disastrous oil spills.
In addition, the upper deck of the Boeing 747 provides over 200 square feet
of space that could be assigned as a command and control center. EIA
possesses an FAA exemption number 1870C that permits the carriage of up to
five individuals that are not crewmembers in the upper deck. This area is
capable of providing space for command and control components that would
assist in sophisticated mapping, incident monitoring and
video/communications downlink relay that might require additional personnel
over and above the required crew.
What airports will Evergreen operate the Supertanker out of?
Evergreen will operate the aircraft from any major airport with sufficient
ramp space to load the aircraft. These include civilian bases, joint use
civilian/military bases and accessible military bases. Generally, the runway
requirements for the Evergreen Supertanker are 8000 feet.
Can the Supertanker fight fires at night, while they are most vulnerable?
The Supertanker utilizes advanced avionics and flies at higher, safer
altitudes, which will enable fire agencies the option of fighting fires at
night, while they are dormant.
Are there any other markets for the Evergreen Supertanker? Can it operate
Evergreen is studying other applications for the Supertanker. Oil spill
containment, chemical decontamination and weather modification are all
potential markets for this aircraft. Because the aircraft is pressurized,
the Evergreen Supertanker has the capability of any long-range Boeing 747
passenger aircraft. This allows the aircraft to deploy to any international
If you want to read up for yourself on this, just go to gibiru.com, do a
search on “Weather Control”, and then start clicking through the links that
come up. You might find it as surprising as I did. Here is the bottom line:
Is weather control real?
Do we have the technology to create a hurricane, or tornado, or earthquakes?
Who has this technology?
The US and Russia. But Russia has been offering the technology for sale.
What specific technologies/techniques can be used to alter the weather and
High-energy lasers can be directed into the atmosphere which creates free
oxygen (O2), this combined with hydrogen to create H2O – water. Space based
lasers are even more effective, and can also create O3 (Ozone) in the
process of creating water in the atmosphere. Water is the most essential
element in weather. The amount of it at a given point in time at a given
location can create wind shifts, rain, (obviously), snow, but a clever use
of it can create a tornado, or, over water, a hurricane. Over warm ocean
water, it creates a very powerful hurricane, and if created in the right
position at the right time, prevailing winds will carry it where you want it
But far more effective than that technology is the HAARP project in Alaska.
This uses VLF (Very low frequency) energy pulses bounced off the ionosphere
to create extreme weather conditions anywhere in the world they wish to
direct it. The Earth has a fundamental resonant frequency of 7.83 hz.
Anything that operates at that frequency risks disturbing all aspects of the
earth. Weather, earthquakes, etc. It depends upon the amount of power
produced. HAARP produces 1.7 gigawatts.
Here are a couple of interesting quotes about it I found on one of the
websites I visited:
"The $30 million [Pentagon] project, euphemistically named HAARP (High
Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), is made to beam more than 1.7
gigawatts (billion watts) of radiated power into the ionosphere -- the
electrically charged layer above Earth's atmosphere. Put simply, the
apparatus is a reversal of a radio telescope -- just transmitting instead of
receiving. It will 'boil the upper atmosphere'. After [heating] and
disturbing the ionosphere, the radiations will bounce back onto the earth in
for form of long waves which penetrate our bodies, the ground and the
oceans." ["Angels Don't Play This HAARP", page 8]
Let us allow Dr. Begich explain this concept. "... this invention provides
the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere
at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level,
particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and
better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art ...." [Page
"... the goal is to learn how to manipulate the ionosphere on a more grand
scale than the the Soviet Union could do with its similar facilities. HAARP
would be the largest ionospheric heater in the world, located in a latitude
most conducive to putting Eastlund's invention into practice." [Page 29]
Furthermore, from this northern latitude, the energy could be aimed into the
ionosphere so that it would bounce back down to the earth so it would come
down wherever the scientists wanted it to come down. The secret was to learn
how and where to aim it to hit the earth where they wanted it to hit,
creating the type of disaster or weather they desired.
In NEWS1198, "U.N. Treaty Proves Weather Control Is Real", we report news
articles that Malaysia actually contracted with a Russian Weather
Modification company to create a hurricane that would be directed close
enough to clear the smoke and smog from Malaysia's cities without actually
coming on to land to create devastation. This Russian company delivered, and
Malaysia had clear skies.
Our information also tells us that, not only can hurricanes be created, they
can be dismantled should scientists so desire. And, they certainly can be
driven on the ocean much like we drive our cars on roadways. Therefore, one
has to ask why American scientists have allowed unprecedented hurricanes,
like Andrew, to ever come on shore. Why are American scientists allowing
extensive damage and lives lost to recent unprecedented storms, since they
have the capability to keep these storms away from us?
HAARP can create nuclear-sized explosions without radiation! [Page 38, 62].
This process is protected by patent 4,873,928.
The greatest concern of New Age scientist Nick Begich, in his book, "Angels
Don't Play This HAARP", is that scientists and the military are so very
arrogant in their ignorant, reckless use of focused energy into the
ionosphere. Military scientists talk about "kicking this thing in high gear
to see what would happen"! This attitude is complete arrogance. What if they
set off an unintended reaction in the atmosphere that cannot be controlled
Well, if a country can deliver nuclear-like explosions anywhere in the world
they wish, without using ICBM missiles and other nuclear delivery systems,
then I suppose that makes traditional nuclear weapons arsenals obsolete for
warfare purposes, and mostly only good for political posturing and
negotiations. That would explain why both Russia and the US were willing to
agree to disarmaments, and reductions in their nuclear proliferation. I
think maybe that was the first time in human history that countries
voluntarily chose to disarm themselves and reduce their ability to conduct
war. Given the nature of mankind and his history, it would make much more
sense if they had a better card up their sleeves.
Judging by the apparent irresponsible arrogance of the people in charge of
it as suggested by Begich, I wonder who should be in charge of
decision-making for this technology. Once a technology is invented, it
cannot be ‘un-invented’. It is now there, and some people will try to use
it. Most will try to use it to their personal advantage and to support their
agendas. Always, it seems that those that want to act in the interest of all
mankind lack the same level of energy and determination of those acting in
self interest, and so the people that push their way to the top into
positions of power and authority rarely act responsibly or altruistically,
but rather they act to gain power and wealth to themselves.
Having said that, if we follow the line of reasoning logically, if we accept
that current technology allows us to create a hurricane, then we have to ask
ourselves who might have started a hurricane like Katrina that specifically
destroyed the area where most of our oil refineries are? In whose interest
does this serve? Who benefits from this?
Another interesting question: Since we apparently not only have the ability
to create a hurricane, and steer it, and even stop it – why did we choose
not to stop Katrina from doing the damage it did? Is the information
incorrect? Can we start them, but not stop them? Or is there some other
reason that Katrina served the purposes of some people? I honestly don’t
know. I’m wondering myself.
Here is a chronology of the technological advances that contributed to
weather control. The comments are not mine but come from that website that I
found. I have to admit – as much as I would like to go back to thinking that
the weather is not controllable, It’s hard to ignore this much information
on the subject.
1900: "Tesla applies for patent on a device to 'Transmit Electrical Energy
Through the Natural Mediums." In 1905, the U.S. Patent Office issue Patent
#787,412 for this purpose. I bet it is news to everyone that the technology
to transmit electrical power without wires exists, and exists so that the
generation and transmission of electricity can be both bountiful and FREE!
Of course, a lot of dollars of sales and profit would immediately vanish, so
Tesla's discovery was never made public.
1924: "Confirmation that radio waves bounce off 'ionosphere 1' (an
electrically charged layer starting at an altitude of 50 kilometers)."
1938: "Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron gyrotron heating
from a powerful transmitter." The fact that untold numbers of powerful
electron heaters are pouring tens of millions of watts of electricity at
Extremely Low Frequencies to effect this Weather Warfare is the major reason
we are experiencing Global Warming! This warming has nothing to do with any
Industrial pollutants or emssions, and certainly not from cow flatulance, as
New Age extremists have claimed. New World Order planners are able to make
dire predictions and then technologically deliver them!
1940: "Tesla announces 'death ray' invention." Our military evidently has
the capability to create a defense shield over our continent by aiming these
electron heaters correctly.
1945: "Atomic bomb tests begin -- 40,000 electromagnetic pulses to follow."
1952: "W.O. Schumman identifies 7.83 Hertz the resonant frequency of the
1958: "Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged particles
trapped in earth's magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. Violently disrupted in
the same year."
1958: "Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes three nuclear bombs inside Van
1958: "White House advisor on weather modification says Defense Department
studying ways to manipulate charges of 'earth and sky, and so affect the
weather'." Wow! Did you know that such a department as "Weather
Modification" existed in the White House way back in 1952? The mere
existence of such an office strongly implies the technology to modify and
control the weather existed.
1960: "Series of weather disasters begin."
1961: "Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960's the
dumping of chemicals (barium powder, etc.) from satellites and rockets
1961-62: "U.S.S.R. and U.S.A. create many electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) in
the atmosphere. 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer by about
4%." Hmm, ozone layer depletion was intentionally created by both Russian
and American governments by nuclear detonations? They not only knew about
it, they measured the extent of the depletion and the time it lasted.
Therefore, do you think it just might be possible that, once again, we have
the situation where a dire prediction is made, with the knowledge that their
scientists can actually make it happen?!
1962: "Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma
resonances by antennas within the space plasma."
1966: "Gordon J.F. MacDonald publishes military ideas on environmental
1960's: In Wisconsin, U.S. Navy Project Sanguine lays extremely low
frequency (ELF) antennae." We are told that the Navy needed this ELF
capability to communicate with their submarines in a way that would be
secure from enemy attack, a claim with which we do not argue. However, is it
also possible that this ELF antennae may serve a dual purpose, of also
helping to control the weather?
1968: "Moscow scientists tell the West that they have pinpointed which
pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological functions
and which frequencies do harm." The very idea that a wicked totalitarian
government serving Antichrist could know how to manipulate thought processes
by the use of electromagmetic pusles is one of the most frightening thoughts
imaginable! This little incident also shows the unusual cooperation between
Russia and America at the height of the Cold War! Such cooperation
constitutes proof of our claim that Russia has cooperated with the Western
Powers since the beginning, in 1917, to stage the mock battle of Thesis
battling Antithesis to produce the Synthesis system of Antichrist called the
New World Order.
1972: "First reports on 'ionospheric heater' experiments with high frequency
radio waves at Arecibo [Alaska]. A 100 megawatt heater in Norway built later
in the decade can change the conductivity of the auroral ionosphere." Now,
you are getting close to being able to control the weather. When you can
manipulate the conductivity of the auroal ionosphere, where weather systems
operate and originate, you are close to controlling the weather. Note the
date here, at which time this technology was realized: 1972.
1973: "Documentation that the launch of Skylab 'halved the total electron
content of the ionosphere for three hours' (by rocket exhaust gases)."
1974: "United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare." We
reported on this terrible treaty in NEWS1196, "U.N. Treaty Proves Weather
Control Is Real". You do not need a treaty banning Weather Warfare unless
such technology already exists and has been proven effective. This means
that this Weather Warfare technology has been fine tuned for 24 years.
1974: "High frequency experiments at Plattsville, Colorado Arecibo, Puerto
Rico, and in Armidale, New South Wales. These experiments heated the 'bottom
side of the ionosphere."
1974: "Experiments -- airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in
ionosphere with accelerated electrons."
1975: "Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that very low frequency
(VLF) from power lines is altering the ionosphere." I remember this report
well, as I scoffed at the idea that power lines could have that kind of
effect on this huge earth. I never thought of the fact that the reason they
could have this kind of effect is that they are just the right kind of
frequency to affect the earth.
1975: "U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces the Navy to release research
showing that extremely low frequency (ELF) transmissions can altar human
blood chemistry." Once again, this technology begins to hit very close to
home, does it not? When an enemy can altar my blood chemistry by aiming ELF
transmissions at me, I can be destroyed with no knowledge of what is
happening to me, or who is doing such lethal damage. Can you also sense the
possibilty of control of an entire population, without the people ever being
aware they are being manipulated?!
1975: "U.S. Senator Pell, Senate Subcommitted, urges that weather and
climate modification work should be overseen by a civilian agency answerable
to the U.S. Congress. Didn't happen." In NEWS1196, we report that Senator
Pell urged the United States to sign this United Nations treaty banning
Weather Warfare. It sounds like Pell was very concerned about the use and
misuse of this technology, even though he is fully aware of the New World
Order Plan and has acted to support it for many years.
1975: "Soviets begin pulsing 'Woodpecker' extremely low frequency (ELF)
waves at key brainwave rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, was one of the locations
where Woodpecker was aimed, and where people were particularly affected."
Once, again, I am extremely agitated to discover that an enemy can destroy
me either biologically or mentally from a distance, without me being aware
1976: "Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show that nerve cells are affected
by ELF fields."
1979: "Launch of NASA's third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory causes
large scale, artificially induced depletion in the ionosphere. The plasma
hole was caused by 'rapid chemical processes' between rocket exhaust and the
ozone layer. The ionosphere was significantly depleted over a horizontal
distance of 300 km for some hours."
1985: "Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent 'Method and Apparatus for
Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or
Magnetosphere'. (First of three Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power
1986: "U.S. Navy Project Henhouse duplicates the Delgado (Madrid) experiment
-- very low level, very low frequency pulsed magnetic fields harm chick
1980's: "In the latter part of the decade, the U.S. begins the network of
Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to generate Very Low
Frequency (VLF) waves ..." IN NEWS1196, we reported that the GWEN towers
created a high level electromagnetic dam in the atmosphere in the American
Midwest that created the rain for 40 days and nights in 1993. GWEN towers
were located right where the rain came down in such a Biblical type deluge.
Furthermore, we showed a map of the United States where you could see the
GWEN towers and where they were located. We found it extremely interesting
that these towers were also located along the San Andreas fault in
Califormai and Nevada, where all these earthquakes of the past decade have
1987-1992: "Other ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI) scientists
build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities."
1994: "Military contractor E-systems buys APTI, holder of Eastlund patents
and contract to build the biggest ionospheric heater in the world, the
High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP). Even though
construction of HAARP towers in Alaska began before this date, this was the
time the decision was made to make it as large as it is now today, over 40
acres of ELF towers.
1994: "Congress freezes the funding on HAARP until planners increase the
emphasis on earth penetrating tomography uses, for nuclear
counterproliferation efforts." Once again, we have to wonder if this
technology might be used to create earthquakes, as well as monitor
compliance with nuclear test ban treaties.
1995: "Congress budgets $10 million for 1996, under "nuclear
counterproliferation' efforts for HAARP project." At least now we know that
the U.S. Government is in firm control of HAARP, the same government driving
us full speed into the global government of Antichrist, known as the New
1994-6: "Testing of first stage of HAARP equipment continues ..."
1996: HAARP planners to test the earth penetrating tomography applications
by modulating the electroject at ELF frequencies." Let's see, were there any
severe or unusual earthquakes, or series of earthquakes, in 1996? We shall
study this and get back to you.
1998: "Projected date for fully operating HAARP system." We have had the
most unusual severe weather in 1997 and 1998. It is no coincidence that the
onset of this unprecedented weather coincided with the completion of the
HAARP system. Now, scientists can create and control all types of weather,
Positive charged ions in the atmosphere are the primary cause of many of the
major health and soil problems associated with government and military
barium salt aerosol from aircraft over the people and land of the United
States and other countries. Barium salt and other chemical aerosol cannot be
excluded as contributing, damaging irritants. Little or no consideration has
been given to the matter of positive / negative ions by those managing the
Positive charged ions are to a large extent products and/or by-products of
the government and military exercises and projects ongoing in the sky and in
the air we breathe. Secret Military Projects - Aircraft Aerosol Spray
Positive charged ions are present because of the activity, expressed in
barium salt, military weather control and various associated and other
radiation present in the atmosphere. The entire man-made atmospheric
environment contributes to the excessive positive ion count.
Negative ions are not present in normal numbers because the conditions that
generate negative ions have been limited, overcome and/or removed as a
result of government and military activity in the atmosphere.
Tesla experimented with electromagnetic flux and studied the earth's
gravitational field. During his research he discovered that the ionization
of the atmosphere would alter when it was charged by radio wave
transmissions in the low frequency range of 10 to 80 hertz. Tesla also
discovered that he could cause both positive and negative ionization of the
atmosphere by manipulating the radio frequency. Further studies indicated
that with positive ionization, people and animals became tired and lethargic
and with negative ionization the effect was one of feeling active and
energetic. It can be manipulated as a military and government tool.
Ions are floating in the air around us all of the time and have either
negative or positive charged on them. Changes in their concentrations or in
the ratio of positively to negatively charged molecules can have remarkable
effects on plants and animals. It is known in science that ion depletion is
the source of a wide range of human health problems, both mental and
These air ions are important to you because if they have a high proportion
of negative ions in the clusters you will feel lively, uplifted and
enthusiastic. Too many positive ions in the clusters will have you feeling
depressed, lethargic and full of aches, pains and complaints.
It is estimated that there are normally 1,500 to 4,000 ions per cubic
centimeter. Negative ions are exceedingly mobile and the Earth's surface has
a negative charge; therefore, negative ions are repelled from the Earth.
This repulsion creates a normal ratio of positive to negative ions in the
range of twelve to ten. Normally, more positive than negative ions exist.
Negative ions are exceedingly beneficial for a person's metabolism as a
means of enhancing human behavior. They act in a complex mechanism to bring
about hormone and biochemical reactions in the body and brain. It is
impossible to get an overdose of negative ions, which act like pure water in
washing away dirty poisons. Generally, the more negative ions you are
exposed to, the better and more uplifted you feel.
Positive ions or the lack of negative ions may cause serotonin
hyper-function syndrome or "irritation syndrome" involves sleeplessness,
irritability, tension, migraine, nausea, heart palpitations, hot flashes
with sweating or chills, tremor and dizziness. The elderly become depressed,
apathetic and extremely fatigued.
Human mood disorders (depressions) are effectively treated with drugs which
specifically block the re-uptake of serotonin into the presynaptic axon
terminal, for example fluoxetine (Prozac) and Zoloft. This suggests that
positive ions may play a part in this condition and the condition may be
safely treated with negative ion therapy.
Average Ions present in air, 1 cm3
Neg. Ions Pos. Ions Total
Clear Mountain Air 2000 2,500 4,500
Normal Land Air 1,500 1,800 3,300
Before a Storm 750 2,500 3,250
After a Storm 2,500 750 3,250
Typical modern office 150 200 350
Closed moving vehicle 50 150 200
Just as good benefits are provided by immersing yourself in negative ions,
bad effects come from breathing air with high density positive ions. As
indicated in the table above, before a storm the positive ion concentration
becomes more than three times the amount of negative ions. If the barometer
is falling in anticipation of a storm, brace yourself. Adults, children, and
animals alike react testily to such bad weather, for ahead is the kind of
day that may leave you most prone to illness or accident, stupid mistakes,
and irrational blowing off steam. Positive ions are responsible. The full
moon increases positive ion ratios, which accounts for the strange and
aggressive behavior noted by police and medical services. Studies show that
75% of the population is noticeably and adversely affected by positive ion
ratios, while increased negative ions tend to have a calming influence on
these same people.
There is an impressive amount of evidence that connects low barometric
pressure before storms with erratic behavior. This is a time where the
positive ions in the air outnumber the negative ions by a ratio of over
three to one. More suicide attempts take place, greater numbers and more
serious accidents occur on the highways and in factories, and an elevated
incidence of fainting spells seem to beset people. An analysis of the
records of some 2000 public school students showed that their "conduct"
marks sagged noticeably before a storm.
Positive ion air encourages increased physical discomforts ranging from
headaches and nausea to the familiar rheumatic twinges that precede storms.
Even the healing rate of wounds has been know to slow up, while the risk of
infection accelerates. Tension and depression are certainly more common.
Conversely, negative ion air - when the weather is quite comfortable - not
only stimulates morale but actually relieves certain chronic diseases.
Experiments with negative ionization have shown marked improvement for
sufferers from high blood pressure, asthma, and hay fever.
The Evergreen Aviation-Pinal Scoop continued... An air of strangeness.
Pinal Airpark is the home of Evergreen Aircraft Maintenance Facility and
Silverbell Army Heliport (SAHP).
Marana became the headquarters of all Central Intelligence Agency air
operations during the Vietnam War years, when it was the primary facility of
Intermountain Airlines, a wholly owned CIA "front" company which was used to
supply covert operations in Southeast Asia & elsewhere. Intermountain was
infamous for its thinly veiled CIA special ops which included development &
use of the Fulton Skyhook, but its cover was its non-scheduled freight &
maintenance operations. Marana was the principal continental United States
maintenance base for Southeast Asia CIA operations including Air America and
Continental Air Services.
The Western Army National Guard Aviation Training Site (WAATS) and other
numerous National Guard units are located inside SAHP. The WAATS and is used
principally for all ARNG AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter training by the
'Gunfighter University'. It is also extensively used by the British Army for
'Conversion To Role' training for Apache combat operations in Afghanistan.
Pinal Airpark also hosts the U.S. Special Operations Command's Parachute
Training and Testing Facility.
Here are a some valued quotes from bloggers:
Sonoma Trails Blogspot "I believe that Pineal airport in Arizona may be a
hub, or station used by Chemtrail spray planes. Evergreen would be a likely
suspect for running the American contribution to the world wide program. I
suppose it would be fairly easy to monitor the air traffic at this airport
to see if it corresponds with the huge volume of chemtrail flights that are
From an annonymous airline mechanic "One day last month I was called out
from our base to work on a plane for another airline. When I got the call
the dispatcher did not know what the problem was. When I got to the plane I
found out that the problem was in waste disposal system. There was nothing
for me to do but to crawl in and fix the problem. When I got into the bay I
realized that something was not right. There were more tanks, pumps, and
pipes then should have been there. At first I assumed that the system had
been changed. It had been 10 years since I had worked on one. As I tried to
find the problem I quickly realized the extra piping and tanks were not
connected to the waste disposal system. I had just discovered this when
another mechanic from my company showed up. It was one of the mechanics who
usually works on these systems. I happily turned the job over to him. As I
was leaving I asked him about the extra equipment. He told me to "worry
about my end of the plane and let him worry about his!"
Evergreen Supertanker on its way to Israel
(Video) As Russian planes continue battling Carmel wildfire, government rents Boeing 747-200 modified into aerial firefighting aircraft; plane expected to arrive Saturday night. Palestinian President Abbas telephones PM Netanyahu, offers 'any help needed'
Pinal Airpark Exposure From The KOLD News 13 Newsroom
"A spokesman with the Army National Guard says natual gas was leaking from a dining facility next to a dormatory housing dozens of pilots and staff. Seventy- two people were evacuated from that dormatory. They spent the night in other quarters."
Public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized.
“Microelectric Mechanical Sensors” (MMS) and “Global Environmental
Mechanical Sensors” sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny autonomous
aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct 31/05]
According to a U.S. military flier called Military Progress, “The green
light has been given” to disperse swarms of wirelessly-networked nano-bots
into the troposphere by remotely-controlled UAV drones for "global warming
U.S. Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force
drones “are slated to deploy various payloads for weather warfare,” Military
************************YOU DO THE MATH****************************
A single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an hour. An Apache gunship gets
about one-half mile to the gallon. The 1,838 Abrams tanks in Iraq achieve
five gallons to the mile, while firing dusty radioactive shells that will
continue destroying human DNA until our sun goes supernova.
A single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns 5,600 gallons of
bunker fuel in an hour - or two million gallons of bunker oil every 14 days.
Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on another half- million gallons
of fuel to supply its jets.
The U.S. Air Force consumed nearly half of the Department of Defense's
entire fuel supply in 2006, burning 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel aloft.
While flying two to five-hour chemtrails missions to reflect incoming
sunlight and slow global warming, a single KC-10 tanker will burn 2,050
gallons of highly toxic jet fuel every hour. The larger and older KC-135
Stratotanker carries 31,275 gallons of chemtrails and burns 2,650 gallons of
fuel per hour.
The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 pounds of CO2. Each
gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2.
Total it up and routine operations by a military bigger than all other world
militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons of carbon dioxide into
the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total could be eliminated by
ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. [TomDispatch.com June 16/07;
huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07]
Meanwhile, the 60 year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone
cannot carry a heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification
particles can be crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail slurry
packed into a tanker the size of a DC-10. T
According to the air force's own weather modification study, Owning The
Weather 2025, clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into
hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report real
time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.
Then these smart particles will be used to increase or decrease the storm's
size and intensity - and "steer" it to “specific targets”.
The air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails “will be able to adjust
their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding situation and make
adjustments throughout the process.” Instead of being sprayed into the air
at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of normal chemtrails, nano
versions will be able to “enhance their dispersal” by “adjusting their
atmospheric buoyancy” and “communicating with each other” as they steer
themselves in a single coordinated flock within their own artificial cloud.
Nano-chemtrails will even “change their temperature and polarity to improve
their seeding effects,” the air force noted. [Daily Texan July 30/07]
Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the military's hope
that these new nano weather-warrior bots: “Interconnected, atmospherically
buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions - clouds of
microscopic computer particles communicating with each other and with a
control system, could provide tremendous capability.”
What about Morgellons? Is there any connection between this bizarre and
frightening malady and nano experiments?
“You're not going to like this,” Hank said. “Morgellons is one unintended
manifestation of nano spray experiments.”
Morgellons manifests - or presents” - as intolerable itching in the skin
followed by alien eruptions of thin hairs or tendrils through the skin.
“It's basically the same as excreting something through a hair follicle,”
He meant a toxin - something foreign to the body.
“If you manufacture a liquid super-cyrstalline structure, vibrate it a
little and give it an electrical charge - it will form into a chain.”
These nanotubes will be invisible to the eye, of course. But their tendency
to clump together could eventually make them big enough to be photographed
and posted on the web.
How much nanocrap has been sprayed so far?
“Tens of tons,” he replied.
Tens of tons of molecules?
“Much of it is still up there,” Hank went on to explain. This is because
nanoparticles are so light and small they tend bind to bind with oxygen
molecules. And piggybacking on oxygen particles makes them buoyant.
“It travels worldwide,” Hank continued. “Some of it comes down. Whatever
it's exposed to up there it brings down here. We get exposed to it. We
breathe it in, we ingest it. It accrues in the same spot every time. And
attracts more of it… “
In the liver.
“The fallout would look like a prion disease,” Hank said.
“Fallout from nanoparticles would eat holes in our brains?”
“Pretty much. Nano particles are ionized particles that go to what attracts
them…. Because of their electro-chemical properties, they are attracted to
the potassium-calcium channel in the brain.”
Think about it, he said. “If they are capable of withstanding the corrosive
upper atmosphere - corrosive sunlight and all those (industrial) chemicals -
what would they have to be manufactured out of? Does the body manufacture
anything that can deal with that? Who will come forward and say these are
A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of
air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance,
or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or
which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or
the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or
damage to business or property. -EPA Air Quality Management Rule 402.
A small factoid ~
"HEPA was developed for the Manhattan Project, it
filters out Barium salts." In relationship to wearing masks.
4474919 Polyalkylene glycol stabilized alkali swellable latex October, 1984 Lobos et al. 524/377
4453979 Dispersion of hydrophilic gums to form non-swelling aqueous alcoholic mixtures June, 1984 De Masi et al. 106/189
4330414 Dispersible hydrophilic polymer compositions May, 1982 Hoover 252/8.5A
4325861 Rapidly dissolved water-soluble polymer composition April, 1982 Braun et al. 106/191
4312675 High concentration polymer slurries January, 1982 Pickens et al. 106/188
4254003 Aqueous polymer dispersion March, 1981 Fox et al. 524/377
4248754 Aqueous dispersion of polymers containing polar groups and amide groups with poly(alkylene oxide) February, 1981 Fox et al. 524/377
4246843 Method for treating imaged lithographic printing plates January, 1981 Garrett 524/377
4213887 Lithographic plate finisher July, 1980 Walls et al. 524/377
4176107 Water-soluble dispersions of high molecular water-soluble polymers containing a surfactant and a water-soluble organic carrier which is a hydroxy compound containing repeating alkylene oxide units November, 1979 Buckman et al. 524/377
4010135 Composition and method for dispersing high molecular weight flocculant polymers in water March, 1977 Tutein 524/377
3899439 Method of preparing aqueous dispersions of hydroxypropyl cellulose August, 1975 Mahlman 106/198
3894880 Process of suspending soluble alginates and compositions so produced July, 1975 Colegrove 106/208
3894879 Process of suspending soluble xanthan gum and pumpable compositions so produced July, 1975 Colegrove 106/189
3839500 N/A October, 1974 Dexter 524/377
3661633 PROCESS AND COMPOSITION FOR IMPREGNATING WOOD AND WOOD PRODUCTS May, 1972 Moren 524/377
3485651 WATER-SOLUBLE CELLULOSE ETHER OR STARCH COMPOSITIONS December, 1969 Ganz 106/213
3220917 High acrylonitrile polymer solutions containing polyoxyalkylene glycols November, 1965 Lowes 524/377
3160985 N/A December, 1964 Ferguson et al. 524/377
5278203 Method of preparing and improved liquid gelling agent concentrate and suspendable gelling agent January, 1994 Harms 523/200
5032659 Process for preparing water-absorbing and water-swellable polysaccharide graft polymers July, 1991 Heidel 527/300
5003060 Readily dispersed/dissolved porous biopolymer granules March, 1991 Vinot 536/114
4735659 Compositions and a process for preparing water dispersible polymers April, 1988 Bishop 106/193R
4720303 Thickening agents and the manufacture and use thereof January, 1988 Soldatos 106/181
4654086 Dispersible xanthan gum March, 1987 Baird et al. 106/206
4325861 Rapidly dissolved water-soluble polymer composition April, 1982 Braun et al. 523/205
4218262 Nonclumping, delayed action viscosity increasing agent August, 1980 Warren 106/206
3960584 Water-dispersible, high molecular weight polymer compositions June, 1976 Savage 106/178
3489719 SURFACE TREATMENT OF FINELY-DIVIDED WATER-SOLUBLE POLYMERS January, 1970 Savage et al. 260/73
3485651 WATER-SOLUBLE CELLULOSE ETHER OR STARCH COMPOSITIONS December, 1969 Ganz 106/179
2647064 Method of improving the cold-water solubility of a fibrous cellulose ether
Bionic self organising nano-robots?
Aerosol Spraying and Nano Technology
NANO CHEMTRAILS by William Thomas
"If you did not enjoy "traditional" chemtrails raining down on you, you are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints." - Full Article
Dr. Roger Leir with George Noory on Coast 2 Coast AM
Dr. Roger Leir discussed his research and conclusions about the strange objects he has removed from patients over the years. Out of the 17 objects Leir has recovered, he said only one has ever been identified as terrestrial in origin. The rest could be "extremely advanced electronic communication devices which are relating information to someone, somewhere," he hypothesized. According to Leir, that 'someone' is likely a sophisticated, perhaps benevolent, alien civilization seemingly interested in saving humanity through genetic manipulation.
US Patent - 4362271
- December 7, 1982 - Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure.
WHY- modify dew with Dimethly Sulfoxide???
Dimethly Sulfoxide is a compound used to carry any substance you like straight through the skin and into our cells. A fantastic compound when used correctly in medicine but not very nice to have on ones skin unknowingly. Whatever follows DMSO will enter your cells.
First fibre victim reported 1984."
AUDIO Jeff Rense and Jan Smith – Morgellons Update 7-7-10
"There are other things which are very difficult to believe. Such is the case with the massive release of the chemical dispersant, Corexit, into our Gulf waters, which will poison life near and far.
Disregarding the very real possibility of the Gulf well blowout being an act of corporate sabotage, for whatever insane reasons, the subsequent crimes committed by federal regulators and BP (British Petroleum) executives, immediately following the oil rig's explosion, are utterly provable, even if unbelievable.
Hundreds of thousands of gallons of the deadly neuro-toxic pesticide Corexit 9500 (and other variants) were immediately dumped at the subsea well head and in surface waters, above. This act of environmental sabotage was approved by federal government officials, who are very well paid to protect our environment and human life, rather than destroy them both.
In a New York Times article it states, " Corexit 9500 and 9527 more than 1.1 million gallons of which has been sprayed in [to the] Gulf since the disaster began."
So quick to dump over a million gallons of Corexit, BP must have expected a blow-out. Otherwise, how did over a million gallons of Corexit just happen to be available for the Gulf of Mexico?
Can we even visualize a million gallons of anything? Think about how many months it would take anyone to manufacture a million gallons of chemical dispersants, especially something as lethal as Corexit 9500 or 9527.
Corexit kills all life from the bottom of life's chain to the top; it kills everything from microorganisms and algae to human beings.
Years ago, even Exxon put out a report outlining the lethal dangers of Corexit entitled, "Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Three Corexit Products: An Overview."
Moreover, Corexit creates monstrous undersea plumes, that are hundreds of square miles large that go unseen by the naked eyes of the world.
This is death to the fragile Gulf Coast ecosystems of plant, animal, and marine life, both in the ocean and in saltwater marshes, as Corexit plumes slip under and over protective booms.
Some studies indicate that Corexit is four times more toxic than crude oil, as Corexit contains cyanide, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, chromium, and other toxic chemicals.
But when Corexit is combined with crude oil its toxicity shoots through the roof. Quoting Pulitzer-prize winning science writer Dehorah Blum, "BP's chosen dispersant, Corexit, rather alarmingly increases the toxicity of crude oil. For instance, Corexit alone has a LC 50 for silver fish of 25.2 parts-per-million. But the EPA's dispersant data shows that Corexit plus fuel oil has an LC50 of 2.61 ppm, almost ten times as toxic."
The dark Monetary Cartel that owns British Petroleum, with their treacherous perversions, has truly and utterly poisoned our punch bowl, with a chemical dispersant (that's illegal to use in Great Britain), while claiming they are making the bowl more nutritious and tasty.
Governmental regulators and BP executives had to have known just how lethal Corexit becomes when mixed with crude oil. Yet US government officials claimed they did not have any predictive data in order to assess the loss of life Corexit might cause, in spite of all the disastrous results engendered by the neurotoxin after the 1989 Exxon-Valdez oil spill in Alaska.
If the BP executives were ignorant of what they were doing, they should have been stopped by officials of our federal government.
Even if our government officials were ignorant of how lethal Corexit really was, they should still be held accountable for all the death and destruction they have allowed, by not stopping BP's use of Corexit.
This is death that can never be cleaned up from beneath the sea or from shorelines, without creating greater disasters.
What kind of psychopaths would even think of manufacturing something like Corexit, much less put over a million gallons of it into our pristine coastal waters?"
Effect of TiO2 nanotube parameters on field emission properties
"The dependence of field emission properties of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes (NTs) has been studied as a function of NT diameter (D) and height (h), which varied in the ranges 18–500 nm and 500–12 000 nm, respectively. The studies showed a strong dependence of the field emission on these parameters. With an increase of NT diameter, the field enhancement factor increased monotonically from 120 to 3800; the current density also increased until D = 320 (current density ~ 3.8 mA cm ? 2), with subsequent decrease for larger diameters. The field emission properties initially improved with NT height until h = 5 µm, and later remained unchanged with further increases in h."
Cascade electric field enhancements around small nanorods of brush-shaped nanostructures
"The optical properties of brush-shaped nanostructures are calculated by the discrete dipole approximation method. The results show that the E fields around the small vertical nanorods of the brush-shaped nanostructures are significantly enhanced due to the E field couplings between adjacent vertical nanorods. In addition, the heights of the large vertical nanorods dramatically affect the E field couplings and enhancements around the small vertical nanorods. These results would help to understand the large surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) enhancements and the height-dependent SERS properties of nanorod array substrates prepared by the oblique angle deposition method."